Monday, July 19, 2010

49 Up

49 Up Review



I've read about this series for years but just never got around to watching any of them. The first film was made in 1964 and was titled 7 Up. It featured a group of seven- year old English school children from different schools, locations and social classes. (Some were from public schools and some were from private schools, which leads to ongoing confusion for me since in England a public school is what we would call a private school and vice versa.)
Apted was 22 years old when he made the first film, and he thought it would be a one time project. But he continued to make a film every seven years, featuring the same people profiled in the first film (though some have dropped out of the project over the years).
49 Up is the film I watched, and it features footage from all the projects made through the years (7 Up, 14 Up, 21 Up, 28 Up, 35 Up, and 42 Up). One of the subjects of the films, John, wonders if the whole thing is just an elaborate exercise in reality TV, but it certainly is much more.
The film captures the idealism of childhood that is often crushed by the realities of the world. It is interesting to see how the filmmaker also had preconceptions that are crushed through the years in much the same way.
In the first film Apted quotes the Jesuits who said, "Show me a boy at seven I give you the man." Some of the children make predictions about their lives that are uncannily accurate (Andrew, for instance, at seven years old predicts the schools he will attend and his profession as a solicitor). But some of the kids defy expectations. Some kids from broken homes fear relationships, but go on to build good marriages and become good parents. Some make foolish mistakes and spoil their childhood dreams and potential.
One interesting theme is the importance of one's roots as an adult. Nick leaves England and moves to the States. The filmmakers take him back to his homeland for this edition of the film. The landscape of the country of his youth was the cold and harsh moors of northern England. He says he does not miss this land but then, when he sees it, he is moved. He says that other locations seem insignificant in comparison.
Most of the subjects talk about how painful it can be to have their lives captured on film every seven years and have it broadcast (on the BBC as well as in the movie theaters) for millions to see. Jackie brings up the unfair nature of a filmmaker's option to pick and choose the segments of their interviews he will use, and feels that she and others have been treated unfairly. Suzy tells Apted she believes 49 will be her last time to participate.
The films remind me of the moment in Annie Hall when children in a classroom stand up and say what they will do in their later lives (one elementary school student in that film stands and says, "I will become a heroin addict and die of an overdose".)
When we look at children, we don't like to think about the trials they will inevitably face in the years to come. But we also can't conceive of the wonderful things they will do in the future.
One of the kids, John, at seven is a child of privilege who talks with his friends about how good it is that his school is expensive, because otherwise poor children would flood in and his classes would be too crowded. You think this kid will grow to be one of the upper class twits so successfully lampooned by Monty Python. To a degree, you'd be right. He goes on to be a barrister who looks quite a bit like Mr. Bean.
But there is more to his story. He was drawn to the woman he married by a shared concern for the poor in the Eastern Europe. The reason he continues to do the film series is to draw attention to the educational and medical needs in Bulgaria.
John is not alone. We see other children grow to be very good men and women who care for their families and for the needs of the less fortunate.
The most poignant segment of the film is about Neil, a bright young kid whose life takes some nasty turns. As a teen, he says he doubts there is a God. At seven, he had dreams of college and career, but he later drops out of school and has trouble finding work. He becomes homeless and admits to questioning his own sanity. In 35 Up, one might have questioned whether the man will even be alive in the next film. But in 49 Up we see a very different man. Little is said about religion in the segments on most of the characters, but Neil in this film has found Jesus. And it has made all the difference in the world.
49 Up came out in 2006. I would now like to see six other films. And I'm looking forward to 2013.
Starting in 1964 with Seven Up, The UP Series has explored this Jesuit maxim. The original concept was to interview 14 children from diverse backgrounds from all over England, asking them about their lives and their dreams for the future. Every seven years, renowned director Michael Apted, a researcher for Seven Up, has been back to talk to them, examining the progression of their lives. From cab driver Tony to schoolmates Jackie, Lynn and Susan and the heart-breaking Neil, as they turn 49 more life-changing decisions and surprising developments are revealed. An extraordinary look at the structure of life in the 20th century, The UP Series is, according to critic Roger Ebert, "an inspired, almost noble use of the film medium. Apted penetrates to the central mystery of life."


Sunday, July 18, 2010

The Photographer

The Photographer Review



Although The Photographer has received many poor ratings and reviews (especially at such places as IMDb), this film is a true gem. In order to appreciate this film to its full potential, one must first open his/her mind. Beginning this story with the expectation of a wealthily produced Hollywood film will only set someone up for disappointment.

As for a small budget, less known film; The Photographer is one of, if not, the best. Granted the story is a bit far-fetched, along with a few characters, the film itself portrays the story excellently. This is a film where there are only a few actors, but only a few are needed to portray what is intended.

The Serendipity Factor: This film includes a few, subtle relations to itself which I call The Serendipity Factor. During the film there are times when things are set up to relate to one another and to give the viewer that little tinkling feeling when knowing that they've 'figured something out' or that they know a bit more than the characters in the film. However 'immature' these things may be in some films, Jeremy Stein does an excellent job of incorporately only a few, subtle ones that give the story an extra punch.

Filming location and lighting do a great job influencing the dark light under which this story is told. Camera movements add to a viewers continuous pondering as to what exactly is going on or what will next happen.

Overall the actors do a great job, namely Reg Rogers who plays the main character Max Martin. This is definitely a great film to watch on a weekend when you're feeling independent and want to boost your own morale a few points. A year after becoming the toast of New York City's art scene, photographer Max Martin has lost his ability to take a decent picture. On the night of his make-or-break gallery opening, surrounded by the trappings of success but devoid of inspiration, Max embarks on a bizarre trek through the city in search of ten mysterious photographs that could save his career.


Saturday, July 17, 2010

Eureka Seven, Volume 2 (Episodes 6-10)

Eureka Seven, Volume 2 (Episodes 6-10) Review



In Eureka Seven volume 2, Renton has successfully come aboard the Gekko. Now that Renton is with his love, his life couldn't be better right? Not Exactly. Eureka's adopted kids want her all to themselves and are willing to do ANYTHING to make sure Renton stays away. This first episode of the disc is very funny, especially what pranks are pulled on Renton.

Later, it's time for Renton's initiation as a a member of Gekkostate and who better than Hap and Stoner to help him? This extremely hilarious episode will leave Renton embarassed, but accepted by the crew. At the end of the day it will be Hap and Stoner that have to face -- absolute defeat.

Later, Renton meets a seemingly nice old woman with Eureka and the kids, but little does he know that she is wanted and the Gekko is after her. Afterwards, Renton starts to learn of Eureka's past and the horror's she committed while in the military. The two begin to understand each other a bit better. Finally, the Gekko takes a trip higher than the sun for a brief time of rest and thought. The disc ends with a mysterious red haired girl welcoming back Dewey, the main villain of the show.

This disc is terrific, containing 5 great episodes of Eureka Seven. The first two episodes are just really funny. The next two involve emotion and we get a glimpse beneath the surface of some character's personalities. The final episode is basically for further thought on the previous ones, as well as what to do next. These episodes are all good, though I like almost all episodes of this show. Still, I recommend this DVD to all anime fans, though if you are new to Eureka Seven, get volume 1 first. Renton has joined his idols as a member of the Gekkostate, but he's finding that life on board this legendary ship isn't what he thought it would be. He struggles to fit in among his new teammates, and has to come to grips with the fact that Holland isn't exactly the perfect hero Renton thought he was. He's also subject to harsh lectures from Talho for no apparent reason, and of course, Renton is still trying to find a way to get closer to Eureka and tell her how he feels. From Bones Studio, mecha designs by Shoji Kawamori. Genre: Action/Sci-fi/Mecha.


Thursday, July 15, 2010

Coffy

Coffy Review



Coffy, Sexy Pam Grier is in this Blaxploitation film, which has all the matters of the time and the circumstances, Action Packed, Coffy(Pam) is Seductive and sexy and in her prime, One of the Best If not the Best Pam Grier movies, There is alot of sick criminals in this film and violence not recommended and certainly behavior I do not condone, But it's a Movie, It has a Gruesome part where a Man Who had information leading to Pam to find her Little sis, He get's his head blown off, and the End will shock you. Excellent yet sadly small part of a Green 70-72 style Corvette Roadster w/period wheels is shown.also Pam is seen nude in the movie.and there is a hot cat fight.Cool Soundtrack too.I have the Vhs Video!

Coffy Feature

  • Used - Like New
In the opening minutes of Coffy, Pam Grier's star-making role, she blasts the skull of a sleazy drug pusher into pulp like a watermelon and shoots his junkie assistant with an overdose of heroin. Jack Hill knows how to open a movie, and he never lets up on the down-and-dirty action. Coffy is an emergency room nurse by day and vigilante by night, targeting the dealers who made her sister a comatose junkie. She works her way up to the Italian mobsters muscling into the ghetto drug trade while she's romanced by glib, smooth-talking politician Booker Bradshaw and wooed by nice-guy cop William Elliot, whose refusal to sell out to the corrupt force earns him a crippling beating.

There's plenty of sex, a catty girl-fight that leaves the losers topless, and car chases and shootouts galore, but what makes Coffy a blaxploitation classic is Grier's Amazonian presence and fiery charisma, and the gritty, low-budget action scenes marked by visceral, wincing violence. Mob strong-arm Sid Haig (Spider Baby) cackles while dragging his victim (a strutting peacock pimp played by Nashville's Robert DoQui) behind a speeding car in a sadistic lynching, and Grier runs down one bad guy with a speeding car and takes care of another with a shotgun to the groin. Hill had previously directed Grier in The Big Doll House and The Big Bird Cage. Their next and last picture together, Foxy Brown, was originally written as the sequel to Coffy. --Sean Axmaker She's the ultimate tough and sexy heroine. She's Soul Cinema superstar Pam Grier, and whether delivering her justice with a shotgun, a razor or just her bare hands, she doesn't miss a beat in this "smashing, no-holds-barred tale of retaliation" (Variety)! Nobody ever commandeered the screen quite like Pam Grier...and Coffy "couldn't be better! [It's] one of the most entertaining movies ever made"(Quentin Tarantino)! Grier is Coffy, nurse by day and avenging angel by night. When she discovers that her little sister has been doped upand freaked outby a greedy drug pusher, she not only puts an end to his miserable days, but she vows to follow his trail of corruption up to the topthe very top. But what Coffy doesn't realize is that all is not as it seemsand that the leafy green behind the pushers' scene just may come from someone she knows!


Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Alexander - Director's Cut (Full Screen Edition)

Alexander - Director's Cut (Full Screen Edition) Review



For those who saw the first version and this version, its like night and day! The revisit shows a lot more alternate character development then the first. You get to see and hear everything clearer being blu ray and all so in my opinion 10 out 10! Academy award winning director Oliver Stone presents a breathtaking new cut of his sweeping epic film, ALEXANDER, the true story of the world's greatest warrior. Using new footage and dramatically reshaping dozens of scenes, he brings to life the overpowering forces and fierce personalities that forever changed history. Torn by the war between his parents (Angelina Jolie and Val Kilmer), Alexander (Colin Farrell) left Greece to face massive armies in Persia, Afghanistan and India -- and was never defeated. "Fortune favors the bold" Stone powerfully demonstrates in this bold new film, ALEXANDER DIRECTOR'S CUT.

DVD Features:
Audio Commentary:Oliver Stone
Documentaries


Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Burn Notice: Season Three

Burn Notice: Season Three Review



Michael Weston is BACK! Season 3 is a thrill ride. Michael Weston is up for the challange and he has Fiona and Sam along. Season 2 left off with one of his arch enimies dead and Michael jumping from a helcopter. Now Michael has a new Female Cop on his case and Fiona now wants Michael to stop putting his life in danger and tells him to make a choice. Love this show...... Studio: Tcfhe Release Date: 06/01/2010 Rating: Nr


Monday, July 12, 2010

Jindabyne

Jindabyne Review



"Jindabyne" (pronounced JIN-da-bine) is a 2006 Australian film about a crisis in the country town of the same name in New South Wales. Four guys on a fishing trip in the deep wilderness discover a body of a young woman in a creek, a woman who's part aboriginal; they unwisely decide to finish their fishing escapades before reporting the body 2 days later. When the press gets ahold of the story the men are publicly castigated for their clueless irresponsibility; their actions are also interpreted as racist by the local native population and the girl's family. Claire (Laura Linney), the wife of one of the men, Stewart (Gabriel Byrne), can't believe they didn't immediately report the body and becomes very suspicious of the incident, as well as alienated from her husband. Meanwhile the killer is on the loose.

"Jindabyne" combines elements of "Deliverance" (1972) and "Picnic at Hanging Rock" (1975). The similarities with the former are obvious, while it shares the latter's haunting ambiance and overall mysteriousness of the Australian wilderness (albeit Eastern Australia rather than Western).

While "Jindabyne" isn't the most captivating piece of celluloid and leaves some aspects unresolved, it did hold my attention and the story provokes numerous insights and questions. For instance, the killer is revealed in the opening shot. This isn't someone frothing at the mouth with evil, but rather an ordinary-looking electrician. One important scene late in the film shows him swatting a bee and we get the impression that he's willing to kill a human being with the exact same indifference. Why's this important? There are ordinary-looking people out there who have no qualms about snuffing out a person's life for their own selfish purposes if they think they can get away with it, just as there are people who would steal, molest or falsely testify without a second thought (take note of the scene where a boy almost gets molested at a secluded beach). We shouldn't assume everyone's like us. There are evil people out there who prey on others; we should be conscious of this and warn our youth. If the aboriginal girl had truly realized this she wouldn't have allowed herself to fall into the killer's grasp.

[Minor SPOILERS follow as I attempt to intrepret the film]

As I understand it, the four men found the body sometime late in the afternoon on Friday and didn't report it immediately because there was no cell phone reception so far back in the sticks. They waited until Sunday to make the call. In the meantime they tied the body to a tree to keep it from being swept downstream and went about their fishing business. This provokes numerous questions: I realize one of them sprained his ankle but why didn't they send one or two back immediately to report the body? Was it too late? Were they concerned about a killer on the loose in the area? How were they able to block out the presence of the dead body to enjoy their fishing trip? If it was a white teenager would they have reacted in the same callous manner?

The story gives evidence that they were fishoholics excited about their adventure and simply weren't prepared to handle the burden and responsibility of a mysterious dead body. Hence, they temporarily blocked out the corpse and continued their endeavors. Later, in the big fight scene with Claire, Stewart admits with all the rage that only guilt can cook up, that it did FEEL GOOD to be fishing for awhile, free from the shackles of his every-day mundane existence in "civilization." But how could it? Maybe because many men have the ability to BE IN THE MOMENT, to focus on their main goal and, basically, forget, for a while, the circumstances surrounding them.

This, I think, director Ray Lawrence portrays effectively in the fishing scene. The day is glorious, the landscape is beautiful and the music is pleasant. The scene is a soothing interlude between moments of tension; it's like momentary heaven on earth. So much so, I found myself smiling along with Stewart and the other guys. And then they remembered the dead body.

Many say the movie is about making a stupid decision and the requisite consequences, as well as repentance, forgivenness and compassion. True, but the movie is also about the differences between the way man and woman view and deal with reality. I doubt most women would be able to ignore the presence of a corpse enough to enjoy a fishing holiday in the wilderness, which explains why Claire becomes so appalled at the guys' actions. No wonder she looks at her husband as if she doesn't even really know him; their marriage was already strained and this understandably rips it apart (to say nothing of the weirdo mother-in-law -- she'd give anyone the heebie-jeebies!).

Another scene that depicts this difference is when Stewart comes home from the fishing trip in the middle of the night. Feeling guilty and confused, he needs to make love to Claire, to touch her and give her pleasure in order to regain a bit of his humanity. Talking about it is not an option for him, there are simply no words. It's evidently a way for Stewart to "skip" the whole event, to deny his own responsablity, to pretend he's not concerned by it.

Yet, I think the film is about scapegoating more than anything. A beautiful young girl is dead and it's almost impossible to discern who did it, so the community's collective pain is hurled at the four doofuses who trivialized her in death in order to preserve their paradisical holiday. Also, the film obviously compares the men's cavalier disregard with the heartless indifference of the killer himself. Which isn't to say they're anywhere close to being as bad as the murderer, not at all, but they do share one of the key traits that enables him to do what he does.

As far as implications of the bee sting go, there are many: (1) It represents the girl taking some small revenge now that she was one with nature (according to the aborigines). (2) It showed nature beginning to assert its dominance over this man who professes a psychological link of some kind with artificial power (electricity), which he also represents, and the way he uses nature to abet his crimes (i.e. hiding in the rocks and disposing of his victims in the stream). (3) It simply shows that his cycle of predation and murder is an eroding one, in that the longer he keeps doing it the more things will happen that are beyond his control, and will eventually lead to his discovery. (4) It signifies how a murderer can kill a person with no remorse or anything, just like killing an insect. And (5) It shows how the killer's still alive since he can feel and react to the bee whereas the girl's dead and gone as her body is unable to feel or react to the insects transgressing her corpse (as depicted in an earlier scene).

The only significant criticism I can voice concerns the corpse of the girl; her body almost looks sexy, which is never the case in real life and even more so in this particular case since the body's been dead for awhile and lying in a creek under the hot sun most of a day. My wife works as a general manager at a large burial park and therefore sees bodies all the time, young and old. Corpses are gross and smelly. Death is never sexy.

FINAL SAY: Maybe the film's not worthy of such a long write-up since it's not the most engrossing flick out there, but I wanted to illustrate how provocative "Jindabyne" is. There's a lot to this film and there's much more I'd like to address but this critique is overkill as it is. Suffice to say, this is a film for thinking people and those who prefer arty brooding flicks. If you appreciated the mysterious vibe of "Picnic at Hanging Rock" you'll probably like this one. I think it's better.

The film was shot in and around Jindabyne, which is a couple hours drive south of Canberra by the Snowy Mountains; needless to say, the locations are a highlight.

The runtime is 123 minutes. Stewart Kane, an Irishman living in the Australian town of Jindabyne, is on a fishing trip in isolated hill country with three other men when they discover the body of a murdered girl in the river. Rather than return to the town immediately, they continue fishing and report their gruesome find days later. Stewart's wife Claire is the last to find out. Deeply disturbed by her husband's action, her faith in her relationship with Stewart is shaken to the core. She wants to understand and tries to make things right. In her determination to help the victim's family Claire sets herself not only against her own family and friends but also those of the dead girl. Her marriage is taken to the brink and her peaceful life with Stewart and their young son hangs in the balance. The story of a murder and a marriage. A powerful and original film about the things that haunt us.